From: Walter Watts (wlwatts@home.com)
Date: Wed Jan 23 2002 - 11:17:50 MST
David Hill wrote:
<snip>
> The shaky basis of proof (either as a priori or as experiential) makes me
> observe the ravings of Michelle, Yash and L'Ermit with amusement so long as
> they remain remote. I'd probably have a different opinion if they were in
> the next cube.
>
> Must go, have actual work to do.
How did Michelle get into this conversation?
Walter
-- Walter Watts Tulsa Network Solutions, Inc. "To err is human. To really screw things up requires a bare-naked command line and a wildcard operator."
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:41 MDT