From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Thu Jan 24 2002 - 23:48:40 MST
On 24 Jan 2002 at 20:38, Blunderov wrote:
> I beg your pardon, the post was ambiguous. I believe JoeDees was designated
> by Kirke Steele as official croc hunter on this mission. But I appreciate
> your reply and I think I agree with you about mathematics.
>
> Dear JoeDees
>
> Do you deny the possibilty of an "a priori" proof altogether? Or did I just
> select bad examples?
>
> Regards
>
> Blunderov
>
> PS Is not being able to falsify something the same as verifying it ?
>
The fact that something is in principle falsifiable does not mean that it
has been either verified or falsified - yet.
The only a priori candidate we have is our own phenomenological
experience. There is definitely something rather than nothing, or we
would not exist to ask the existence question.
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:41 MDT