Re: virus: Re:Reclaiming the commons? Necessary?

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Mon Sep 02 2002 - 12:41:52 MDT


On 2 Sep 2002 at 6:43, Hermit wrote:

>
> [Joe Dees Ranted]
>
> Hermit, you pathetic chickenshit! You're just scared shitless of
> engaging me in a debate ...
>
> [Hermit Responds]
>
> I suppose you imagine that this is the correct way to issue a
> challenge to a debate? But whiole I deplore your form, whatever made
> you think I would reject such a challenge? I accept.
>
> Weapons: Words - in a formal debate.
>
> Location: #debate on IRC at irc.lucifer.com.
>
> Rules of engagement: as per the channel FAQ in the making
> http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/index.php?board=31&action=display&threadiðó'
> d=26335&start=0 and Robert's Rules of Order.
>
> Time: I suggest the first engagement to be this week or weekend. But
> am prepared to be flexible in this respect. Unless you offer an
> alternative, I will take it that you will meet me there at Thursday,
> September 5, 2002, at 00:00 Z
> (http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?day=5&month=9&ye@ö'
> ar=2002&hour=0&min=0&sec=0&p1=0).
>
> Moderator: Limbic (Jonathan Davis) has consented to act as a moderator
> for the first debate. Naturally, in this instance, the vote would be
> put to #virus.
>
> Initial Proposition: The US is not justified in taking unilateral
> action against Iraq. Hermit proposing. Joe Dees opposing.
>
> I recommend that you examine the proposed channel rules to establish
> whether there is anything which offends you about them.
>
If you really want to debate the issue, you can do it right here on the
email list.
> ----
> This message was posted by Hermit to the Virus 2002 board on Church of
> Virus BBS.
> <http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/index.php?board=51;action=display;thread
> id=26332>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:55 MDT