Re: virus: Re:Reclaiming the commons? Necessary?

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Mon Sep 02 2002 - 17:25:35 MDT


On 2 Sep 2002 at 16:35, Hermit wrote:

>
> [Hermit] Now, as for anyone who uses slippery slope arguments, we know
> that you can think from a-> b. Big deal.
>
> [Hermit] You want to debate it, stop playing the dickless chicken.
>
> [Joe Dees] The difference between thee and me is that I have
> well-supported arguments, whereas you only possess gratuitous insults.
>
> [Hermit] Yea - right.
> [Joe Dees] Hermit, you pathetic chickenshit!
>
That's right, I have insults AND arguments; you only possess the
former.
>
> [Hermit] A few differences that are probably apparent to those other
> than yourself are that I can reason well enough not to engage in
> argument with somebody who chooses to act like, or is, a boorish,
> bigoted fool; that my insults are never gratuitous; and that I am not
> stupid enough to challenge somebody to a debate and then try to welsh
> out of it, so dispersing credibility - like dried chickenshit - to the
> winds; and finally, that I don't piss all over people and then assert
> that they support my position, when they could make that statement for
> themselves - and choose not to.
>
All you have to do is debate the issue right here; I'm waiting...but I ain't
holding my breath - just my nose. Ad hominem attacking me rather
than/instead of debating me is akin to shooting the summons-server so
one won't have to receive and answer the summons. It just digs you in
deeper.
> ----
> This message was posted by Hermit to the Virus 2002 board on Church of
> Virus BBS.
> <http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/index.php?board=51;action=display;thread
> id=26334>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:55 MDT