Re: virus: Why cats survive falls

From: Dr Sebby (drsebby@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Jun 20 2003 - 02:23:23 MDT

  • Next message: Jonathan Davis: "RE: virus: Facts on illegal immigrant health care costs to the rest of "us""

    ...i recall hearing that after reaching terminal velocity, the relaxed cat
    tends to stretch out or become more limber, thus acting as a sort of
    parachute mechanism and actually slowing the cat's velocity.

    DrSebby.
    "Courage...and shuffle the cards".

    ----Original Message Follows----
    From: "rhinoceros" <rhinoceros@freemail.gr>
    Reply-To: virus@lucifer.com
    To: virus@lucifer.com
    Subject: virus: Why cats survive falls
    Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 08:25:26 -0600

    Who needs nine lives?
    http://www.newscientist.com/lastword/article.jsp?id=lw1018

    Question:
    A friend of mine reckons that you can drop a cat from any height and it will
    survive unhurt because its terminal velocity is lower than the speed at
    which it can land unhurt. Can someone confirm or refute this because the
    kittens in my house now look strangely at my friend. I'm sure this can't be
    true, can it?

    Anna Goodman , Oxford, UK

    Answers:
    I'm reminded of a study reported in the Journal of the American Veterinary
    Medicine Association in 1987 by W. O. Whitney and C. J. Mehlhaff, two New
    York vets, entitled "High-rise syndrome in cats". The study was also
    summarised in Nature a year later.

    Briefly, the authors examined injuries and mortality rates in cats that had
    been brought to their hospital following falls ranging from between 2 and 32
    storeys. Overall mortality rates were low, with 90 per cent of the cats
    surviving, a fact that supports the correspondent's ailurophobic friend.
    However, the study unexpectedly found that the incidence of injuries and
    death peaked for falls of around seven storeys, and then actually decreased
    for falls from greater heights.

    The Nature article presents three main variables that determine injury and
    mortality rate ­ the speed reached by the moggy, the distance in which said
    moggy is brought to a stop, and the area of moggy over which the stopping
    force is spread. While concrete streets work in nobody's favour when it
    comes to stopping falling items, cats suffer relatively little injury
    (compared to their owners) because they do indeed reach lower terminal
    velocities and absorb the shock of stopping so much better. A falling cat
    has a higher surface area to mass ratio than a falling human, and so reaches
    a terminal velocity of about 100 kilometres per hour (about half that of
    humans). They are also able to twist themselves so that the impact is spread
    over four feet, rather than our two. And as they are more flexible than
    humans, they can land with flexed limbs and dissipate the impact forces
    through soft tissue.

    To answer the paradoxical increase in survival rates once seven storeys has
    been reached, the authors suggested that an accelerating cat tends to
    stiffen up, reducing its ability to absorb the impact. However, once
    terminal velocity is reached, there is no longer any net force acting on the
    cat, and so it will relax, increasing both its flexibility and the
    cross-sectional area over which the impact is dissipated once the cat hits
    the ground.

    I'd still keep your friend away from your kittens, if I were you. Few
    buildings in your home town of Oxford are seven storeys high, but there are
    plenty of rivers about.

    John Bothwell , Marine Biological Association, Plymouth, Devon, UK

    =============================

    [rhinoceros] Here is a left brained joke among the answers:

    I don't know what the terminal velocity of the average cat is ,but this
    question did remind me of a joke.

    Because cats always land on their feet and toast always lands buttered side
    down, you can construct a perpetual motion machine by simply strapping a
    slice of buttered toast to a cat's back. When the cat is dropped it will
    remain suspended and revolve indefinitely due to the opposing forces.

    Catherine , Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent,UK

    ================================

    [rhinoceros] And here is a more generalized try:

    The risks to different animals of taking a fall were laid out in 1927 by the
    biologist J. B. S. Haldane, in Possible Worlds and Other Essays. He wrote:
    "Gravity, a mere nuisance to Christian, was a terror to Pope, Pagan, and
    Despair. To the mouse and any smaller animal it presents practically no
    dangers. You can drop a mouse down a thousand-yard mine shaft; and, on
    arriving at the bottom, it gets a slight shock and walks away.

    "A rat is killed, a man is broken, a horse splashes. For the resistance
    presented to movement by the air is proportional to the surface of the
    moving object. Divide an animal's length, breadth, and height each by ten;
    its weight is reduced to a thousandth, but its surface only to a hundredth.
    So the resistance to falling in the case of the small animal is relatively
    ten times greater than the driving force. An insect, therefore, is not
    afraid of gravity; it can fall without danger, and can cling to the ceiling
    with remarkably little trouble."

    John Forrester , Edinburgh, UK

    ----
    This message was posted by rhinoceros to the Virus 2003 board on Church of 
    Virus BBS.
    <http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/index.php?board=54;action=display;threadid=28723>
    ---
    To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to 
    <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
    _________________________________________________________________
    Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*  
    http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
    ---
    To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 02:23:55 MDT