RE: virus:Pentagon weighs WMD hunt cutback

From: Blunderov (squooker@mweb.co.za)
Date: Thu Oct 30 2003 - 06:05:25 MST

  • Next message: Mermaid: "virus: Re:Virian Fitness Boot Camp"

    [Blunderov]
    If I was to describe the situation, as I see it, using a chess metaphor
    I would say that Bush et al had played for mate but find themselves
    instead playing a tricky endgame. It may be holdable, but some static
    weakness is now inherent in the USA position, and it has the more
    potential for becoming overextended the longer the game goes on.

    I would offer a draw.

    Best Regards
    <q>
    http://www.msn.com/
    Pentagon weighs WMD hunt cutback

    U.S. may switch some Iraq resources to counterinsurgency
    Oct. 29 -- The State Department's newly retired intelligence chief says
    the U.S. intelligence community "badly underperformed" for years in
    assessing Iraq and should accept responsibility for its failure in Iraq.
    NBC's Andrea Mitchell reports.
     
    ASSOCIATED PRESS
    WASHINGTON, Oct. 29 - As violence has spiraled in Iraq, top U.S.
    officials have debated pulling intelligence officers off the so-far
    unsuccessful hunt for weapons of mass destruction and reassigning them
    to counterinsurgency efforts, officials said Wednesday.
     
    THE UNITED STATES already is planning to recruit more Iraqis to gather
    information about opposition fighters and may increase security measures
    to protect troops, President Bush said Tuesday, the third straight day
    of bombings in Iraq.

    But Pentagon, CIA and other top officials have not been able to agree on
    whether to reassign some of the 1,400 people working on the weapons
    search, three officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said
    Wednesday.
           
    One intelligence official said they have been struggling for more than
    three weeks over the question of whether shifting intelligence personnel
    to the battle against insurgent forces would be harmful. Other
    possibilities include moving the needed intelligence officers, linguists
    and others from somewhere else, contracting outsiders or options that
    the official declined to cite.
           
    Some officials have made the case that the No. 1 priority is to stop the
    attacks on coalition forces, Iraqis and international organizations.
           
    Others are arguing that it's vitally important to find out what happened
    to biological and chemical weapons that the Bush administration said
    Saddam Hussein had and which constituted the main rationale for war.
    </q>

    ---
    To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Oct 30 2003 - 06:06:30 MST