I know this is only tangentially related to the main topic of this thread, but has anyone used Google’s new Google Scholar?:
 
     http://scholar.google.com
 
I just now heard about it via a brief article in The Scientist (“Google Scholar welcomed: New academic search service is applauded but librarians, academics have some reservations”—by Doug Payne) at this URL:
 
     http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20041123/01
 
<snip>However, Michael Eisen, co-founder of another open-access publisher, Public Library of Science (PLoS), pointed out that people using the service will face an important obstacle—many of the articles are only available to journal subscribers.
     “While Google may have the noble goal of making ‘the world’s scientific literature universally accessible,’ the fact remains that most of the articles returned in a Google Scholar search can only be accessed by those fortunate enough to have a subscription to the relevant journal,” he told The Scientist.
     A PloS spokeswoman added: “Google will find that they can better serve their searchers’ needs for access to complete scholarly articles by ‘flagging’ as open access or ranking more highly those that are freely available online.  Such a system would minimize people’s frustration at finding an article that looks perfect for their research needs but discovering that they are unable to access it.  This frustration is already quite evident in the various threaded discussions occurring online.”
<snip>
_____________

Walter Watts <wlwatts@cox.net> wrote:
Google’s stock soars, but why?

By RACHEL BECK

AP Business Writer

NEW YORK (AP) — Sometimes when stocks soar, it has nothing to do with
investors’ genuine interest in the company’s prospects. They just buy
because the stock is going up. . . .


’Tis better to have loved and lost
than never to have known what it’s like
to have sex with someone besides yourself.  —LenKen


Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.