If I suggested that it is possible to analyze a symphony,
is that the same thing as saying it is impossible to
enjoy a symphony? I don't think so.
>Or on another tack: an extremely large and important part
>of human acivity is just the reverse of science: instead of
>operating out of theory, it works on the suck-it-and-see
>principle of evolution. (There's a proper name for that,
>which you can find on the Principia Cybernetica site if
>you're so inclined.) But there's not much of the
>supernatural in suck-it-and-see, is there?
Suck-it-and-see sounds like an experiment.
-- David McFadzean david@lucifer.com Memetic Engineer http://www.lucifer.com/~david/ Church of Virus http://www.lucifer.com/virus/