Re: virus: Re:Jobs and Human History

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Tue Jul 29 2003 - 12:41:35 MDT

  • Next message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "RE: virus: Re:Jobs and Human History"

    Date sent: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 11:54:29 -0600
    To: virus@lucifer.com
    Subject: virus: Re:Jobs and Human History
    From: "athe nonrex" <athenonrex@godisdead.com>
    Send reply to: virus@lucifer.com

    >
    > a simple illustration (revisited):
    >
    > [joe dees]
    > so ducks, you claim, would live in the sea,simply because they can
    > float in different bodies of water? that is utterly perposterous! why
    > would they ever live in the sea with such stormy and un-duck-friendly
    > conditions? what you are proposing is that all ducks would move to the
    > sea because you observe that they indeed can float in different bodies
    > of water. well then, show me, for i do not accept this proposal.
    >
    > [athenonrex]
    > well, you don't quite understand, i said, firstly, that they could
    > live in the sea, not that they would live in the sea. of course not
    > all ducks would move there simply because i think they should, and i
    > don't think that they should in the first place. what i am porposing
    > is perposterous, simply because you have never seen a duck float in a
    > pong or a lake, and also a duck float in a river? or other such
    > different bodies of water? that's a fallacious refusal of evidence.
    >
    > i am not talking about weather, once again, as i have stated before.
    > rather i am talking about ducks' bouyancy. it makes little sense to
    > argue about weather when i'm talking about ducks, wouldn't you agree?
    > or is that perposterous too?
    >
    > [joe dees]
    > but the storms. tell me, if there were much storming somewhere, and
    > you could move there simply because you could float in the water that
    > was there, would you? highly unlikely...
    >
    > [this post was a dramatization. no screen names were harmed in the
    > making of this post, though some egos may have been. all things are
    > true, especially those things that are false, as our actor 'joe dees'
    > has just proved. thank you for your attention. we now return you to
    > your regularly schedualed programming.]
    >
    I submit this post for inclusion in the CoV Bad Analogy Hall of Fame;
    athe nonex obviously cannot successfully debate the issue
    straighforwardly, and is thus reduced to profferring off-tangent
    metaphorical attempts.
    > ----
    > This message was posted by athe nonrex to the Virus 2003 board on
    > Church of Virus BBS.
    > <http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/index.php?board=54;action=display;thread
    > id=28871> --- To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to
    > <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>

    ---
    To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 30 2003 - 09:47:32 MDT