virus: Re:"Brights" more destructive than good / WSJ attacks atheism

From: rhinoceros (rhinoceros@freemail.gr)
Date: Mon Oct 13 2003 - 15:04:48 MDT

  • Next message: metahuman: "virus: Re:"Brights" more destructive than good / WSJ attacks atheism"

    [Mermaid]
    a suggestion: after everyone is done having their say, i think there has to be a group consensus...and a response to dinesh d'souza's article should be sent to opinionjournal.com...this would be a great opportunity to make cov visible...circulating cov stamped articles(opinion of cov as a group with the writing credit to the authors who put together the articles)/opinion pieces on the net and to other publications..usually as a response to nonsensical and malicious rants (not to mention illogical) is a good start

    if we can make this the topic of tuesday's chat...wednesday should be a reasonable finish date to put together the cov position on d'souza's rant and the brights...

    i propose this for a virian project. would anyone like to 'sponser'(i dont know what this means...if anyone does...do explain) it?
     

    [rhinoceros]
    Good idea. But Tuesday is... when? Tomorrow? I think IRC chats tend to become brainstorming sessions, so it might be better if we already had a couple of drafts, chatted about them, and finalizing them afterwards.

    Anyone quick enough to write a good one, preferably in language for the masses?

    ----
    This message was posted by rhinoceros to the Virus 2003 board on Church of Virus BBS.
    <http://virus.lucifer.com/bbs/index.php?board=54;action=display;threadid=29508>
    ---
    To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Oct 13 2003 - 15:04:57 MDT