RE: virus: God doesn't play dice with the universe

Einstein was wrong indeed but he was talking about the unsertenty and spontainious nature of quantum mecanics. He realy did'nt like it becouse of the same reason most of rational people don't like the answer:"becous" to the question:" why" In quantum mecanics a particle does not need a reason to do something like splitting it selve. This also iritates me abouth this theory, it makes it somehow not complete as a theory. Though im no specialist at al in this field, being a molecular microbiology student I do know something about it becouse of the obvious links with molecular orbitals in biological importand mollecules. My quirkines about unsertenty and spontanity in quantum mecanics does make me think of  some non cristian creationists disbelive in the spontanious way the first replicon must have started they think life could not be started spontaniously(so there wave to be a creator acording to them). I am shoked I think al like a litle. I myselve understand how live could have started but what i don't understand is why a particle yust moving a cross space suddenly kan be two different particles and some more energy and that this can happen completely without any interaction with other particles.  Einstein had a feeling which he did not want to ignore even though he could see no alternative to it....

does anybody know if the string theory explains anything about all of this?

I ofcourse fully agree with the rest of Walters point but for now I only an going to analyze my own fecal patterns In the smallest room of my student house 

 greets 

Uisge    
From: Walter Watts >Reply-To: virus@lucifer.com >To: virus >Subject: virus: God doesn't play dice with the universe >Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:41:22 -0600 > >When Einstein said "God doesn't play dice with the universe", he was >wrong. > >Not only does he (nature) play dice, he's a compulsive gambler. > >He likes to throw shit up against the wall and see what sticks. > >I think it's part of our job here at CoV to analyze the fecal patterns >on the wall. > >Kinda like modern-day, scientific tea leave readers. > >Walter > >-- > >Walter Watts