Re: virus: Why?

From: athe nonrex (athenonrex@godisdead.com)
Date: Wed Apr 14 2004 - 12:40:21 MDT

  • Next message: Walter Watts: "Re: virus: Why?"

    --- "Walter Watts" <wlwatts@cox.net> wrote:
    If folks would learn just a "wee" bit more regarding the weirdness inherent in quantum physics, they would quit asking the annoyingly anthropomorphic question:
    "Why is there something rather than nothing?"

    One could just as easily ask "Why do we think it intuitively proper to ask the above question?" as opposed to the counterpart "Why would nothing be the default state of the universe?"

    Walter

    [Athenonrex]

    well, remember...'nothing' doesn't technically exist. it would
    potentially exist if it weren't labelled, but giving it a label,
    semantically speaking, makes it a 'thing'...therefore, 'nothing' is
    really 'some thing'. so if the intellectual concept of 'nothing' is
    in existence, then the physical concept of 'nothing' doesn't exist,
    otherwise there wouldn't be a word for it.

    semantically speaking...

    nothing; syn.: void, null, nihl, vaccuum, etc...

    _____________________________________________________________
    --->Get your free email @godisdead.com
    Made possible by Fade to Black Comedy Magazine

    ---
    To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 14 2004 - 12:41:36 MDT