From: Steele, Kirk A (SteeleKA@nafm.misawa.af.mil)
Date: Mon Mar 11 2002 - 17:24:54 MST
if ya wanna step up to this plate, better bring a bigger bat.
AGAIN. pay attention. don't zip off a testosterone driven retort after
summarily skimming over the dross of your own subjective interpretation. Get
your feet wet, by gettin off your intellectual arse. I conveyed an entire
timeline of references in the BRITISH press, not ameriKan. I told you why
the ameriKan press would be lax in covering the story and by way of evidence
backed that up.
Like I pointedly remarked to, if all you are seeking is to pander the
miasmatic meanderings of your myopic misanthropy, get over yourself. If, on
the other hand, you sincerely have a cogent concern regarding the perception
you have over the lax nature of the forth estate in the ameriKan arena, at
least do your homework before you come to class...
Have a nice freakin day!
Kirk Steele
Progress comes from the forefront of knowledge. If you're not thinking
on the edge, you're taking up space. Get out the way!
-----Original Message-----
From: n0rt [mailto:xianan@ozemail.com.au]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 8:35 AM
To: virus@lucifer.com
Subject: Re: virus: US Apparently going to war? DUH?
Hi all,
I have been reading this list for the last couple of months and would like
to thank you all for providing me with such a wide range of intellegent
fodder with which to expand my conciousness. A sycophantic special mention
must go to Hermit - thank you, you have been an inspiration.
I hate to do this in my first post but I just cant pass up the opportunity
to piss on a pedant:
Kirk - your links below are three months old. Zphobic was referring to a
[i]/recent[i] development about a (possibility of a) request for 25 000
troops from the UK. Quite a significant development that is certainly
newsworthy, considering its a signal to an event that is going to have very
serious ramifications for all concerned. Much more serious than the shipping
of a few more army officers to a region that at the time was getting
slightly warmer. If this has not been reported in mainstream american media,
I would also wonder why. (Although, it has taken the aussie press two days
to get the story out, but things do sometimes take a bit longer to reach
this part of the world.) Got any recent proof that this is being told to the
american public?
Regards,
n0rt
"Work smarter or you will end up looking like a foolish space waster at the
forefront of superciliousness going blah blah blah yackity schmackity rant
rant rant rant rant"
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steele, Kirk A" <SteeleKA@nafm.misawa.af.mil>
To: <virus@lucifer.com>
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 6:50 PM
Subject: virus: US Apparently going to war? DUH?
> "Game on"
> By the way, such disingenuous affectations of "the sky is falling, the sky
> is falling" is hardly an effective manner of presenting ones self as being
a
> member of the socially aware clan. Chicken Little-isms don't carry much
> weight around these parts. I assume that since you did conduct a
> interstitial search of the informational detritus located proximally about
> the confines of your nest that you are at least, in theory, aware of the
> manner in which information searches on the web are conducted. In under
100
> keystrokes I was able to locate the following links, along with an
> un-forwarded plethora of others. Before you go whinning at the top of your
> beak "the conspiracy of censorship is falling, the conspiracy of
censorship
> is falling", at least show a modicum of effort, get out of your nest, do
> some free range poking in the www.dirt <http://www.dirt> (btw, that AINT
a
> web site, so DONT CLICK ON IT!!!) for some new worms, then and ONLY then
> come cackling back to the roost as fast as your chicken little feet can
> carry you!!!
> "Side out"
>
> "Service.........Game point"
> And, it is being reported on in America. the following sites have the
> information. It is just that there has been no great awareness on the part
> of the mass (read: catering to the brainless masses of moo-cows sucking on
> the dribbling teat of ameriKan television "journalism") media.
>
> http://www.newyorker.com/press/content/
> <http://www.newyorker.com/press/content/>
> The New Yorker, for all you non-yanks (hail and praise to you all) is a
> "society rag" about life in the Big Apple (NY city). So when the editorial
> staff of said rag feel it incumbent upon to report on something that is so
> completely outside of their forum, one must necessarily question their
> reasons for doing so. In this case, they realize that the stentorian and
> interminable drone of the drums of war (see CNN for "America-Under Siege"
> day 16,482) on ameriKan TV will not soon give up the righteous glory of
the
> all hallowed commercial appeal of bringing the blasting to bitsy bits of
the
> beleaguered bad guys on one chunk of dirt, to that of a previously
> unfinished piece of business on a similarly unstrategic chunk of dirt.
>
> Oh, I hear the passionate rumblings of rebuttal forming now to forward the
> all hallowed prerogative of "american ideals" and human rights, and
> suppression of terrorism, ...blah blah blah blah..............Get over
> yourselves.
>
> Hussein is an intolerable tyrant. He kills his own people for his own
> agenda. he wants weapons of mass destruction so he can assert his private
> agenda as the "righteous agenda" of the Iraqi state. Fuck Him! Nuke Him!
By
> what ever means necessary, take that SOB out of the picture. The world is
> toooooo small a place for Machiavellian overtures.
>
> But let's not forget that we elect ideological groups in ameriKa that do
> exactly the same thing all in the name of their "righteous national
agenda".
> Ever hear of the word "hegemony"?
>
> And the New Yorker Magazine is aware that their subscribing readership is
> comprised of a lot of people with a lot of money and a lot of societal
> clout. So what is in the mix? Well, along with the next piece of "GenSer"
> information, we can deduce that the efforts in Afghanistan are serving a
> secondary role. Along with the primary function of actually kicking some
> badguy butt, Unkle Sam gets the rest of the world looking one way while
> ameriKa slips a couple of thousand troops into Kuwait from the other
> direction.
> http://tampatrib.com/nationworldnews/MGA8ZZJ09VC.html
> <http://tampatrib.com/nationworldnews/MGA8ZZJ09VC.html>
> Smoke and Mirrors!!! That's how unKle Sam get the job done. Three card
> monty, shell game, and the fun house!!!
>
> Also, if you want to know of what other indicators to be on the watch for,
> consider monitoring the movements of the following units listing in this
> article.
> http://www.janes.com/defence/land_forces/news/jmb/jmb011211_1_n.shtml
> <http://www.janes.com/defence/land_forces/news/jmb/jmb011211_1_n.shtml>
> http://www.accessatlanta.com/ajc/terrorism/military/afghan/1214army.html
> <http://www.accessatlanta.com/ajc/terrorism/military/afghan/1214army.html>
> http://www.spiescafe.com/afi/afi011216a.htm
> <http://www.spiescafe.com/afi/afi011216a.htm> (a rather tasty info NGO,
if
> I ever saw one.)
>
> Now, if you'll pardon my withdrawal from this conversation, I have to
return
> to my class in media communications. I was teaching remedial researching
for
> the informationally imnpaired. No, wait a minute, that was in here.
hm......
>
> Kirkafreakingsaurus Gaaaawddamnedwrecks
>
> blah blah blah yackity schmackity
> rant rant rant rant rant
>
> "side out, point, game"
>
> some where...overtheline
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zphobic [mailto:zphobic@softhome.net]
> Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 7:59 PM
> To: virus@lucifer.com
> Subject: virus: US Apparently Going To War
>
>
> I can't find any mention of this on CNN or npr.org. A friend looked on
> MSNBC, Washington Post, and ABC News, and didn't see it. US censorship?
>
> - Zphobic
>
> http://www.observer.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,665083,00.html
> <http://www.observer.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,665083,00.html>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:44 MDT