From: ben (ben@machinegod.org)
Date: Sat Apr 20 2002 - 11:06:48 MDT
[ben 0]So which do you think is more factual, this piece or the very similar
(but opposing) one you posted previously, viewable at
http://www.mediareviewnet.com/jewsforjustice.htm ?
[Mermaid 1]My previous url, http://www.mediareviewnet.com/jewsforjustice.htm
is more factual than the latest spam/chain letter.
[Mermaid 1]Why? The answer would have been crystal clear if you have read
either of them.
[ben 1] I wasn't asking why because I didn't know, I was asking why to find
out your reasons for believing such. Beleive me, Ir ead them both start to
end. The JfJ piece is a long string of quotations and historical 'factoids'
with little or no backing context. The spam is, well, obvious garbage. But
you are promoting the JfJ article like it was the third testament ;)
[Mermaid 1]The Jews for Justice url does not appeal to emotion/religious
affiliation. The spam does.
[ben 1] The Jews for Justice url conveniently toes the CoV party line. The
spam does not.
[Mermaid 1] I can probably slash through every one of those
20 points. Unfortunately, I am a little pressed for time and its the weekend
even. I will work on it as soon as time permits. I promise.
[ben 1] No need, I can do it just as well :) Like I said, it is undeniably
garbage. I'm just not convinced that the JfJ article is much better. So far,
I've only read it, not any of it's source material. Some of the source books
were already on my list, and have been "bumped up" as it were. Even so, the
source material isn't neccessarily trustworthy either is it?
[Mermaid 1] I think it will be worth a read for you in order to recognise
facts from BS. Again,
that will surface when I get back.
[ben 1] Um... I'm frustrated, not retarded. But thanks :) The separation
process would be easier if there were any recognizable facts...
[ben 1] Anyone ever been in the position where you are embarassed to tell
strangers your name? Yeah it can make you irrational after a while...
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Sep 25 2002 - 13:28:46 MDT