From: Rafael Anschau (anschau.ez@terra.com.br)
Date: Thu Aug 14 2003 - 13:24:07 MDT
What we need is a legislation to enforce economic justice WITHOUT giving
people the incentive to live off the right, and become unproductive.
That's pretty much it. Whoever comes up with it should become a
candidate for the nobel prize.
[]'s
Rafael
> Well, not socialist but democratic components are necessary. (Popper has
> refuted most of Marx points, making him look, well, not very bright to
> say the least). In the case below about water supply, those
> underserved by water supplies should legaly claim that some sort of
> economic justice be enforced. (Maybe some sort of policy where the government
> buys water supplies and sells it to the poor at a lower price). Now in
> the case of prisions, well they can't be privitized and whoever tought
> of it first should be arrested. IMHO
>
>
> []'s
>
> Rafael
>
>
>
>
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-virus@lucifer.com [mailto:owner-virus@lucifer.com] On Behalf
> > Of Rafael Anschau
> > Sent: 13 August 2003 01:49 AM
> > To: virus@lucifer.com
> > Subject: Re: virus: Scientology: What is it? What are your opinions?
> >
> > Well, governmentologists(as you call non-anarquists) believe in
> > political science and economics which is based on reason not dogmas.
> > Anarchic societies are utopic. Some sort of government is necessary to
> > enforce justice and protect the weaker from the stronger. So far,
> > open societies based on democracy, free trade, freedom and justice seem
> > like the way to go.
> >
> > []'s
> >
> > Rafael
> >
> > [Blunderov] Well yes - but I have some reservations. There are aspects
> > that are somewhat less than satisfactory. There has arisen amongst us a
> > class, the corporate entity, which enjoys all the legal protections and
> > privileges of humans and yet it has none of the conscience of normal
> > persons - they graze at will in our societies and their scats are
> > composed of human misery.
> >
> > I'm thinking here, to give two examples, of water supplies that have
> > been privatized beyond the means of the poor and the obscenity of
> > free-enterprise prisons. I have come to the conclusion that some
> > socialist mechanisms are probably a necessary component in any society -
> > in fact I think I may be becoming a sort of 'neo Marxist'.
> >
> > So, I think I favor what used to be known as a mixed economy - a
> > combination of the best of Socialism and the best of Capitalism balanced
> > in a manner tailored to the society that it services.
> >
> > Just a closing thought - what if asylums for the insane were privatized?
> > A situation would arise in which either the insane would be turfed out
> > into the streets due to lack of funding, or a lot of perfectly sane
> > people would be committed in order to keep the shareholders happy. Not
> > good either way.
> >
> > Best Regards
> > Blunderov
> >
> >
> > ---
> > To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
>
> --
> Rafael Anschau <anschau.ez@terra.com.br>
-- Rafael Anschau <anschau.ez@terra.com.br> --- To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Aug 14 2003 - 09:28:10 MDT