From: Michelle Anderson (michelle@barrymenasherealtors.com)
Date: Tue Jan 13 2004 - 10:10:45 MST
[Pat] NO EXCUSES IŽLL SEND I DO NOT WANT TO BE IN YOUR & ALL OF YOUR
LIST
[Michelle] Interesting that this actually pissed someone off that
much...
I hadn't thought about the Bush-related political backside of this, I
thought he perhaps was just trying to be some glorious Kennedy-like
inspirational leader and thought he should round it out in science.
With biological sciences crippled by his outlawing of most stem cell
research and his pitifully anti-modern social goals, perhaps space was
the only place left for a clean and non-sinful scientific breakthrough.
The broader point of the article ("is mars ours?") made me think of how
difficult it is to protect natural processes. We can't even all agree
to leave the lake under antarctica alone, even though there is potential
that merely sampling its waters could disrupt its alien (to us mammals)
life-balance. If there is bacteria in water somewhere on mars, some
would say that means we should take it as a sign of viability and go
ahead and transport earth life there to seed. But what about the unique
processes that might breed life totally unlike ours on that planet?
So the question to me is not why are we seeing any support for this from
such a backward administration but what kind of steps are necessary for
truly acceptible evidence that we are not disturbing preexisting
processes of evolution? What odds are good enough that we're not
destroying a potential intelligence with a right to evolve? Or is that
ridiculous, do humans belong everywhere we can exist no matter what?
--- To unsubscribe from the Virus list go to <http://www.lucifer.com/cgi-bin/virus-l>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jan 13 2004 - 10:09:24 MST